Mat Performance Tables 2017

Hat exclusion policy mat complaints policy 2019 20.

Mat performance tables 2017.

Performance tables ofsted reports policies. Please take care when drawing conclusions about a mat s improvement or fall in performance based on progress 8 alone. With the mat for at least 3 full academic years and have results in the 2016 school performance tables. Those with at least three schools that had results at either key stage 2 or key stage 4 as published in the 2017 school performance tables where 2.

Number of 16 18 students included in 2019 mat performance measures applied general qualifications cohort. For example knowing a mat had a progress 8 score of 0 2 in 2018 and a score of 0 2 in 2019 tells you how the mat compared to the national average in those years but not whether its performance improved across years. Including the impact of a change to performance measures and a look at mat disadvantage figures. City of norwich school an ormiston academy.

Number of 16 18 students included in 2019 mat performance measures academic qualifications cohort. 5 not all schools that are able to teach pupils at the end of the key stage necessarily did so in 2017. It is based on measures of progress for mats with 3 or more academies that have been with the mat for at least 3 full academic years and have results in the 2017 school performance tables. Those schools had been with the mat for at least three academic years.

Analysis on the performance of multi academy trusts mats. Mat performance measures. Mat havering child left at school policy 2017 21. The government has today published its multi academy trust mat performance league tables based on 2017 exam results.

Multi academy trust performance measures 1 school types and characteristics information as published in the 2017 school performance tables.