Mat Performance Tables 2018

They also score lower in terms of the government s new average point score for the ebacc which in 2018 was 3 78 among mats compared with 4 12 for all state funded schools.

Mat performance tables 2018.

Schools or colleges covering 16 18 study in this mat s performance data. Data on the performance of multi academy trusts mats. City of norwich school an ormiston academy. These statistics are based on measures of progress for mats with three or more academies that have been with the mat for at least three full academic years and have results in the 2019 school performance tables.

Academy trust performance 2018 revised 24 january 2019 this publication shows revised gcse and equivalent statistics for key stage 4 ks4 in 2018. For example knowing a mat had a progress 8 score of 0 2 in 2018 and a score of 0 2 in 2019 tells you how the mat compared to the national average in those years but not whether its performance improved across years. The mat level performance measures are created using data from. The dfe has published statistics on the performance at key stage 4 of state funded mainstream schools in multi academy trusts in england.

Number of 16 18 students included in 2019 mat performance measures academic qualifications cohort. The government has written to trust bosses to inform them of the change which it hopes parents and staff will use to hold them to account. Number of 16 18 students included in 2019 mat performance measures applied general qualifications cohort. This statistical first release and mat level data in performance tables provides data and analysis on the performance of mats in england at key stage 2 ks2 and key stage 4 ks4 respectively.

Multi academy trusts mats responsible for a group of academies. Please take care when drawing conclusions about a mat s improvement or fall in performance based on progress 8 alone. At the same time 56 per cent of mats have an ebacc entry rate below the national average. Around two thirds of mats had an ebacc point score lower than the national average.

Including the impact of a change to performance measures and a look at mat disadvantage figures. More academies that have been with the mat for at least 3 full academic years and have results in the 2018 school performance tables.